The KAISERNET Message Board

>>11
South Korea is one of the worst nations in the world regarding cultural degeneracy. Their birth rates are actually the lowest in the world, and their feminists are some of the only ones I've yet heard who advocate for complete racial extinction of themselves.
I can say that if Japanese got rid of its Chinese characters, its culture as well would be reshapen into something unrecognizable, because Japan is a nation traditionally with one of the richest cultures in the world -- regarding art, literature, political history, what have you -- all of these things were penned with Chinese characters. As a concept a cultural-linguistic reset might not always be a bad thing, but in the case of atomized worker ants hurtling toward extinction, there is not enough soul left upon which to found a new national culture -- if you think it's bad now, you don't want to see what would happen if you stripped away the ties to the past they do have.

>your whole message is aggressive for a reason I cannot comprehend as well.

Your whole message is a derailment of the topic with a contradictory assertion that holds no merit whatsoever. There is no reason why an empire that died 1,500 years ago should have an eternal stranglehold on all nations of the world, even though it does have a stranglehold on the world's most important language (which is still Germanic). One alphabet is not superior to another, but if I had to concede so, I'd say Latin is vastly inferior for not having the capability to transcribe the sounds of most European languages without letters being crafted for it, which you say should be erased. It is an alphabet belonging to a dead language that was heavily simplified in phonetics even in its time. Its use in more phonetically conservative and complex languages was never a good thing and in fact is overtly outdated today.

Note: Check the anti-spam filter, they prevented me from sending messages a lot of times - no profanity included of course.
... I'm going to host the paragraph enabling it to a paste site at this point.
At least rereading myself to track the word activating the filter is permitting me to remove germanic words.

paste dot debian dot net /hidden/c915ac5b/

word filter cannot compete with cig clack dock

>>7

>Someone I know holds a theory that any Indo-European language that places stress on the first syllable will ultimately collapse into ruin just as English and other Germanic languages have. There are many greatly conservative IE languages alive today, including Lithuanian, most Slavic languages, and Icelandic.

I'm curious if there's any linguistic or phonotactic phenomenon which would explain why this seems to occur so often. Surely there must be some theoretical underlying reason?

>>7
Actually sorry for the month-late reply, I've been so busy lately I initually didn't even bother to put in the effort to think about it and respond, but I hate to let it sit:

As a Southerner, and a student of two highly corrupt and redneckish Germanic languages, which are Norwegian and Dutch, the short answer is that placing stress on the first syllable makes the rest of the word go to Hell. You get about 1-2 opportunities for emphasis in any given word in our languages, and we Englishers usually use it on the first syllable with every other syllable receiving unstressed vowels. Think about how Americans pronounce long Japanese names: NAKǝmurǝ, TOYodǝ. While the horror of our pronunciations varies, it always gives you a pure vowel on the stressed syllable and a corrupt "uh" for following vowels, where applicable.

Languages which retain grammatical cases today necessarily must be ones that have not historically let the ends of words go unstressed, because if something goes unpronounced for a century or two it will be forgotten. While Japanese is nearly barren of grammar, it's known as "mora-timed" where Germanic languages are stress-timed. In Japanese each syllable is given a roughly equal amount of time and spoken with pure vowels, and emphasis is pretty much optional. In contrast spoken English hurtles haphazardly through each syllable with arbitrary timing, which I happen to think is interesting and musical in itself, but our languages are highly given to slurring which persists as a slippery slope because we now lack the grammar for it to matter.

posting hard（；ω；）

ク